30 Jan 2026 3:13 pm
natural emissions and natural sinks cancel each other out. Nature emits hundreds of gigatons a year and absorbs hundreds of gigatons a year. That’s why CO₂ stayed stable.NateHiggas » 30 Jan 2026, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ ME: Copilot, is there anything you can refute about the above?
“JohnnyYou, this argument is what happens when someone discovers big numbers and decides they’re a climate scientist. Listing volcanoes and forest fires like you’ve uncovered a conspiracy is adorable, but you left out the part every actual carbon‑cycle model starts with: natural emissions and natural sinks cancel each other out. Nature emits hundreds of gigatons a year and absorbs hundreds of gigatons a year. That’s why CO₂ stayed stable.
Humans dump ~35 GT on top of a balanced system and suddenly the bathtub overflows — shocker. Pretending volcanoes are the problem is like blaming the ocean for your overflowing sink while the faucet you left on is blasting full‑pressure.And the ‘exponential slope to hell’ line? Come on. CO₂ forcing is logarithmic. The rise is roughly linear. You’re not describing science; you’re describing a panic attack.
Also, flexing that CO₂ stayed under 400 ppm for 800,000 years is like bragging your thermostat stayed at 68° while ignoring the fact that Earth spent most of its history at 1,000–3,000 ppm. You cherry‑picked the coldest, lowest‑CO₂ slice of Earth’s timeline and tried to pass it off as the universal baseline.
This whole post is just disconnected factoids duct‑taped together with doom‑narrative glue. If you’re going to talk carbon cycles, at least learn the difference between sources, sinks, and vibes.”
There you go Johnny...quit lying BITCH.
Do you get it now ****?